Why AWS Migrations Stall or Fail
Issues with AWS migration projects often show up in the project’s initial stages:
Recruiting a full in-house cloud team
Hiring experienced AWS migration experts takes time. And leaving the migration to your in-house team deprioritizes product roadmaps and maintenance work.
Treating AWS tools as the migration strategy
AWS tools cannot assess your portfolio, map dependencies, or decide what to rebuild. Experienced engineers must make those decisions.
Accepting a proposal before proper discovery
A vendor that prices the migration before studying your applications and dependencies will discover hidden integrations, technical debt, and compliance requirements after work begins. They will then have to expand the scope, extend the deadline, or deliver a poorly-architected AWS environment.
Applying one migration pattern to every workload
Applying lift-and-shift to all workloads transfers existing technical debt to AWS. Some applications benefit from replatforming or refactoring, while others should move unchanged, stay where they are, or retire.
Losing senior oversight after the project begins
Critical context is lost when consultants who assess your environment hand the project to a team of junior engineers. The new team may discover dependencies and risks during testing or cutover, incurring more costs and delays.
The end result
Each issue increases the chance that a migration stalls or ends in a rushed move that incurs more cost or requires a do-over after cutover.










